People v. Shaver

37 A.D. 625, 13 N.Y. Crim. 420, 55 N.Y.S. 729

This text of 37 A.D. 625 (People v. Shaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Shaver, 37 A.D. 625, 13 N.Y. Crim. 420, 55 N.Y.S. 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

Putnam, J.:

In this case the questions raised are substantially the same as in People v. Edwin Shaver (ante, p. 21). It was also claimed in this case that the original judgment and sentence was void for uncertainty, because it fixed no place of imprisonment, and that the Court of Sessions had no power to modify the judgment of a Court of Special Sessions by adding the words “in the county jail of Delaware county.” Under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I should say there could be no doubt as to the power of the court below to modify the judgment rendered by the justice by adding the words in question. I think the same disposition should be made of this case as in that of People v. Edwin Shaver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D. 625, 13 N.Y. Crim. 420, 55 N.Y.S. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shaver-nyappdiv-1899.