People v. Sharpe

241 A.D.2d 977, 661 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7956
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: This matter was remitted to Oneida County Court for a reconstruction hearing and findings of fact and a determination whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing (People v Sharpe, 225 AD2d 1075). Al[978]*978though the issue whether defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing was disputed at the reconstruction hearing, the hearing court, which saw and heard the witnesses, found that defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing and that no additional hearing took place thereafter. There was ample testimony adduced at the hearing to support the court’s finding, and we will not disturb it (see, People v Michalek, 218 AD2d 750, 751, lv denied 86 NY2d 874).

We have considered the additional arguments raised in defendant’s original brief and conclude that they do not require reversal. (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Attempted Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sharpe, 241 A.D.2d 977, 661 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

241 A.D.2d 977 (People v. Sharpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pitsley
300 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Childs
247 A.D.2d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)