People v. Shapiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shapiro

53 A.D.2d 597, 385 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13254

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 597 (People v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Shapiro, 53 A.D.2d 597, 385 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on November 22, 1974, convicting defendant, after trial before Pécora, J., and a jury, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree and sexual abuse in the third degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction for sodomy in the first degree, dismissing that count in the indictment and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The prosecution failed to present evidence corroborating complainant’s testimony that defendant had forced her to perform an act of sodomy. Accordingly, the conviction therefor must be reversed and the People so concede. We have examined the other contentions raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on November 22, 1974, convicting defendant, after trial before Pécora, J., and a jury, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree and sexual abuse in the third degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction for sodomy in the first degree, dismissing that count in the indictment and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The prosecution failed to present evidence corroborating complainant’s testimony that defendant had forced her to perform an act of sodomy. Accordingly, the conviction therefor must be reversed and the People so concede. We have examined the other contentions raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 597, 385 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shapiro-nyappdiv-1976.