People v. Shannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shannon

288 A.D.2d 38, 732 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10367

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 38 (People v. Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Shannon, 288 A.D.2d 38, 732 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered January 28, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 4x/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s application made pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79). The court sufficiently complied with the three-[39]*39step Batson procedure and appropriately determined that the prosecutor’s explanations were nonpretextual and involved acceptable criteria. The court’s determinations are entitled to great deference (People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350, 356-357, affd 500 US 352). Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andidas, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered January 28, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 4x/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s application made pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79). The court sufficiently complied with the three-[39]*39step Batson procedure and appropriately determined that the prosecutor’s explanations were nonpretextual and involved acceptable criteria. The court’s determinations are entitled to great deference (People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350, 356-357, affd 500 US 352). Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andidas, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 38, 732 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shannon-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack