People v. Shampine
This text of 55 A.D.3d 1423 (People v. Shampine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case is held, the decision is reserved, the motion to relieve counsel of assignment is granted, and new counsel is to be assigned. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant’s assigned appellate counsel has moved to be relieved of the assignment pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38 [1979]), and has submitted an affidavit in which she concludes that there are no nonfrivolous issues meriting this Court’s consideration. Upon a review of the record, we conclude that a nonfrivolous issue exists as to whether County Court erred in denying defendant’s request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Therefore, we relieve counsel of her assignment and assign new counsel to brief this issue, as well as any other issues that [1424]*1424counsel’s review of the record may disclose. (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Court, Kim H. Martusewicz, J.—Sex Offender Registration Act.) Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Lunn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 A.D.3d 1423, 864 N.Y.S.2d 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shampine-nyappdiv-2008.