People v. Shakur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shakur

144 A.D.2d 600, 535 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11957

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 21, 1988·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), rendered March 3, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

Further, we find that the court’s supplemental instruction relating to the concept of acting in concert was proper. It was responsive to the jury’s inquiry and the charge as a whole was not prejudicial to the defendant (see, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, cert denied 459 US 847). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), rendered March 3, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

Further, we find that the court’s supplemental instruction relating to the concept of acting in concert was proper. It was responsive to the jury’s inquiry and the charge as a whole was not prejudicial to the defendant (see, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, cert denied 459 US 847). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

People v. Shakur, 144 A.D.2d 600, 535 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

144 A.D.2d 600 (People v. Shakur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related