People v. Seward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Seward

54 A.D.2d 939, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Seward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Seward, 54 A.D.2d 939, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered April 9, 1975, convicting him of four counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and four counts of criminally selling a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated April 8, 1975, which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment and order affirmed on the opinion of Mr. Justice Jones at Criminal Term. The determination herein is consistent with the recent Court of Appeals decision in People v Pena (37 NY2d 642). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered April 9, 1975, convicting him of four counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and four counts of criminally selling a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated April 8, 1975, which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment and order affirmed on the opinion of Mr. Justice Jones at Criminal Term. The determination herein is consistent with the recent Court of Appeals decision in People v Pena (37 NY2d 642). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 939, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-seward-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack