People v. Sevencan

15 A.D.3d 506, 789 N.Y.S.2d 434, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1586

This text of 15 A.D.3d 506 (People v. Sevencan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sevencan, 15 A.D.3d 506, 789 N.Y.S.2d 434, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of. error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 1, 1999 (People v Seven-can, 258 AD2d 485 [1999]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 21, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Ritter, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.3d 506, 789 N.Y.S.2d 434, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sevencan-nyappdiv-2005.