People v. Sevencan

909 N.E.2d 572, 12 N.Y.3d 388
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*389 OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

The application for a certificate granting leave to appeal should be dismissed.

The 2004 Drug Law Reform Act states that “[a]n appeal in accordance with the applicable provisions of the criminal procedure law may ... be taken as of right by the defendant from an order specifying and informing such person of the term of the determinate sentence the court would impose upon resentencing” (L 2004, ch 738, § 23). Defendant here seeks leave to appeal an Appellate Division affirmance of such an order (58 AD3d 761 [2009]). In People v Bautista (7 NY3d 838 [2006]) this Court held that similar language in the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act did not permit an appeal to this Court from an Appellate Division order affirming a denial of resentencing, because the act did not make such an order appealable under Criminal Procedure Law § 450.90 or § 470.60, which govern appeals to this Court. The reasoning of Bautista applies with equal force to the language at issue in this case.

Application pursuant to CPL 460.20 for a certificate granting leave to appeal dismissed by Judge Smith in a memorandum. Publication authorized by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sevencan, 909 N.E.2d 572, 12 N.Y.3d 388 (N.Y. 2009).

909 N.E.2d 572 (People v. Sevencan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The People v. Stanly A. Brown
34 N.E.3d 851 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Reese
922 N.E.2d 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Mike
922 N.E.2d 912 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)