People v. Settles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Settles

2 A.D.3d 349, 768 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14033

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 349 (People v. Settles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Settles, 2 A.D.3d 349, 768 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14033 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered May 29, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea after a suitable inquiry at which defendant received a sufficient opportunity to present his contentions (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The court properly relied on its recollection of the plea proceedings and correctly rejected defendant’s claim that the voluntariness of his plea was impaired by the medication he was taking (see People v Alexander, 97 NY2d 482 [2002]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered May 29, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea after a suitable inquiry at which defendant received a sufficient opportunity to present his contentions (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The court properly relied on its recollection of the plea proceedings and correctly rejected defendant’s claim that the voluntariness of his plea was impaired by the medication he was taking (see People v Alexander, 97 NY2d 482 [2002]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 349, 768 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-settles-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack