People v. Setaro
This text of 44 A.D.2d 847 (People v. Setaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 28, 1970 on resentence, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the second degree and criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordererd. The findings of fact have not been considered. In our opinion defendant did not receive a fair trial. The introduction of wholly extraneous matters and the circus atmosphere of the trial require a reversal, notwithstanding the improprieties and incitements by defense counsel (People v. Steinhardt, 9 N Y 2d 267). The trial court unduly interjected itself into the proceedings, [848]*848displayed an antagonistic attitude toward defense counsel, bolstered prosecution witnesses and belittled the contentions of the defense in its charge to the jury (see People v. Askew, 42 A D 2d 717; People v. Ramsey, 40 A D 2d 837; People v. Macchio, 40 A D 2d 836; People v. Sostre, 37 A D 2d 574). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Latham, Cohalan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.D.2d 847, 355 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-setaro-nyappdiv-1974.