People v. Sessoms

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sessoms

265 A.D.2d 191, 696 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10162

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 191 (People v. Sessoms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sessoms, 265 A.D.2d 191, 696 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel FitzGerald, J., on motion; Richard Price, J., at plea and sentence), rendered December 24, 1996, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1) forecloses appellate review of his present claims, none of which raise any questions about the voluntariness of his plea. In any event, we would find the issues raised by defendant to be without merit. [192]*192Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel FitzGerald, J., on motion; Richard Price, J., at plea and sentence), rendered December 24, 1996, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1) forecloses appellate review of his present claims, none of which raise any questions about the voluntariness of his plea. In any event, we would find the issues raised by defendant to be without merit. [192]*192Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 191, 696 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sessoms-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack