People v. Sessing
184 A.D.2d 600
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), imposed November 28, 1990.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence was appropriate. We have considered the defendant’s contentions in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Harwood, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Sessing, 184 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
184 A.D.2d 600 (People v. Sessing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Royan D.
2004 NY Slip Op 50238 (New York Family Court, 2004)