People v. Sessing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sessing

184 A.D.2d 600

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 A.D.2d 600 (People v. Sessing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sessing, 184 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), imposed November 28, 1990.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence was appropriate. We have considered the defendant’s contentions in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Harwood, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), imposed November 28, 1990.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence was appropriate. We have considered the defendant’s contentions in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Harwood, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sessing-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack