People v. Serigano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Serigano

42 A.D.2d 720, 346 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3960

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 720 (People v. Serigano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Serigano, 42 A.D.2d 720, 346 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 8, 1971, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to three months’ imprisonment in the Suffolk County Jail. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an unconditional discharge. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In light of defendant’s good character, the absence of any prior institutional record, and the underlying facts regarding the crime for which defendant was convicted, it is our opinion that the interests of justice would best be served by the modification made herein. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 8, 1971, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to three months’ imprisonment in the Suffolk County Jail. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an unconditional discharge. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In light of defendant’s good character, the absence of any prior institutional record, and the underlying facts regarding the crime for which defendant was convicted, it is our opinion that the interests of justice would best be served by the modification made herein. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 720, 346 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-serigano-nyappdiv-1973.