People v. Sentilles

182 A.D.2d 725

This text of 182 A.D.2d 725 (People v. Sentilles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sentilles, 182 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), rendered December 17, 1990, convicting him of conspiracy in the fourth degree, and attempted grand larceny in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sentilles-nyappdiv-1992.