People v. Senape
This text of 277 A.D.2d 405 (People v. Senape) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered March 14, 1996, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, unauthorized practice of a profession, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (eight counts), and falsifying business records in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, GPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 405, 716 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-senape-nyappdiv-2000.