Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Seminuk

People v. Seminuk

59 A.D.2d 645, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13516
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 16, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 645 (People v. Seminuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Seminuk, 59 A.D.2d 645, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: On this application it does not appear that a fair trial cannot be obtained in Chautauqua County, and at this time we deem the motion premature (see People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Hatch, 46 AD2d 721; People v Sekou, 45 AD2d 982). Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ. (Order entered Sept. 13, 1977.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Sekou
45 A.D.2d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
People v. Hatch
46 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.2d 645, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-seminuk-nyappdiv-1977.