People v. Sellers
This text of 295 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Molea, J.), rendered June 6, 2000, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Under CPL 270.15 (4), a challenge for cause is deemed waived if it is not made before a prospective juror is sworn as a trial juror. Here, the defendant did not at any time challenge for cause the jurors now at issue. Consequently, any objection regarding jury selection must be deemed waived (see People v Boddie, 240 AD2d 155; People v Clark, 132 AD2d 704).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J.P., Altman, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 A.D.2d 629, 744 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sellers-nyappdiv-2002.