People v. Sellers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sellers

254 A.D.2d 204, 679 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11413

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D.2d 204 (People v. Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sellers, 254 A.D.2d 204, 679 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered December 19, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of [205]*205two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree and one count of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two consecutive terms of IV2 to 3 years and a concurrent term of 6 months, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s actions and statements clearly provided the jury with ample evidence from which defendant’s accessorial liability could be reasonably inferred. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered December 19, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of [205]*205two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree and one count of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two consecutive terms of IV2 to 3 years and a concurrent term of 6 months, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s actions and statements clearly provided the jury with ample evidence from which defendant’s accessorial liability could be reasonably inferred. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 204, 679 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sellers-nyappdiv-1998.