People v. Selg
This text of 110 A.D.2d 918 (People v. Selg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decision to grant or deny a youthful offender application is a discretionary one (see, People v Parris, 109 AD2d 853), and here there was no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s application for that relief.
As to defendant’s contention that the court erred in accepting his pleas, that issue was not preserved for appellate review because of defendant’s failure to raise it at Criminal Term (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.2d 918, 488 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-selg-nyappdiv-1985.