People v. Selg
110 A.D.2d 918, 488 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48822
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1985·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The decision to grant or deny a youthful offender application is a discretionary one (see, People v Parris, 109 AD2d 853), and here there was no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s application for that relief.
As to defendant’s contention that the court erred in accepting his pleas, that issue was not preserved for appellate review because of defendant’s failure to raise it at Criminal Term (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Selg, 110 A.D.2d 918, 488 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 918 (People v. Selg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ariola
15 A.D.3d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Thompson
202 A.D.2d 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Marsh
125 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Moore
125 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Williams
124 A.D.2d 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Dunlap
119 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)