People v. Selby

82 A.D.3d 433, 917 N.Y.2d 861
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determi[434]*434nations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). In an area known for drug activity, a trained and experienced narcotics officer saw defendant converse briefly with a man known to the officer to be a local seller of heroin and cocaine. Defendant received an unidentified object from the known drug dealer in exchange for money. These circumstances provided probable cause for defendant’s arrest (see People v Jones, 90 NY2d 835, 837 [1997]; People v Frierson, 61 AD3d 448 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 915 [2009]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, DeGrasse, Richter and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Selby, 82 A.D.3d 433, 917 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

82 A.D.3d 433 (People v. Selby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Spencer
2017 NY Slip Op 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)