People v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Seeley

44 A.D.3d 1077, 843 N.Y.S.2d 836

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 2007·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 20, 2004 (People v Seeley, 13 AD3d 562 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 25, 2003.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that she was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 20, 2004 (People v Seeley, 13 AD3d 562 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 25, 2003.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that she was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.

People v. Seeley, 44 A.D.3d 1077, 843 N.Y.S.2d 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

44 A.D.3d 1077 (People v. Seeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related