People v. Seeland
184 A.D. 901
Opinion
Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county reversed and a new trial ordered, upon the ground that there is no such satisfactory evidence supporting the testimony of the complainant as is required by section 2013 of the Penal Law. (People v. Page, 162 N. Y. 272; People v. Smith, 114 App. Div. 513; People v. Plath, 100 N. Y. 590.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Seeland, 184 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
184 A.D. 901 (People v. Seeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The People v. . Plath
3 N.E. 790 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
People v. . Page
56 N.E. 750 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
People v. Smith
114 A.D. 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)