People v. Sebelist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sebelist

206 A.D.2d 901, 616 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 A.D.2d 901 (People v. Sebelist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sebelist, 206 A.D.2d 901, 616 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly concluded that New York law applies to the custodial interrogation of a 16-year-old Pennsylvania resident conducted by members of the New York State Police in a Pennsylvania police station concerning the suspect’s involvement in a homicide committed in New York (see, People v Benson, 88 AD2d 229; see also, People v Ostas, 179 AD2d 893, lv denied 80 NY2d 932).

The court did not abuse its discretion either in denying defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment or in imposing the maximum indeterminate term of imprisonment for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty. (Appeal from Judgment of Seneca County Court, Falvey, J.—Criminal Possession Firearm, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly concluded that New York law applies to the custodial interrogation of a 16-year-old Pennsylvania resident conducted by members of the New York State Police in a Pennsylvania police station concerning the suspect’s involvement in a homicide committed in New York (see, People v Benson, 88 AD2d 229; see also, People v Ostas, 179 AD2d 893, lv denied 80 NY2d 932).

The court did not abuse its discretion either in denying defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment or in imposing the maximum indeterminate term of imprisonment for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty. (Appeal from Judgment of Seneca County Court, Falvey, J.—Criminal Possession Firearm, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 901, 616 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sebelist-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack