Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Seaya

People v. Seaya

228 A.D.2d 455, 643 N.Y.2d 410, 643 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6203
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 455 (People v. Seaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Seaya, 228 A.D.2d 455, 643 N.Y.2d 410, 643 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was not denied meaningful representation by counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Castro, 211 AD2d 806; People v Hayes, 186 AD2d 268). The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Hayes
186 A.D.2d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Castro
211 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 455, 643 N.Y.2d 410, 643 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-seaya-nyappdiv-1996.