People v. Searor

163 A.D.2d 824, 559 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9484
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s claim regarding jail-time credit is not properly before this court on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (CPL 450.10 et seq; People v Curtis, 143 AD2d 1030, lv denied 73 NY2d 890; People v Leonard, 133 AD2d 938). Defendant’s proper remedy is by way of a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the prison authorities’ calculation of the jail-time credit to which he claims entitlement (People v Curtis, supra, at 1030; People v Vivenzio, 103 AD2d 1044, 1045; People v Blake, 39 AD2d 587). (Appeal from judgment of Oswego County Court, Auser, J.—sexual abuse, first degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Searor, 163 A.D.2d 824, 559 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

163 A.D.2d 824 (People v. Searor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Paulin
2018 NY Slip Op 3379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Witcher (William)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
ATKINSON, PAUL F., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Atkinson
105 A.D.3d 1349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Person
256 A.D.2d 1232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)