People v. Searor
This text of 163 A.D.2d 824 (People v. Searor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s claim regarding jail-time credit is not properly before this court on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (CPL 450.10 et seq; People v Curtis, 143 AD2d 1030, lv denied 73 NY2d 890; People v Leonard, 133 AD2d 938). Defendant’s proper remedy is by way of a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the prison authorities’ calculation of the jail-time credit to which he claims entitlement (People v Curtis, supra, at 1030; People v Vivenzio, 103 AD2d 1044, 1045; People v Blake, 39 AD2d 587). (Appeal from judgment of Oswego County Court, Auser, J.—sexual abuse, first degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A.D.2d 824, 559 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-searor-nyappdiv-1990.