People v. Sealey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sealey

61 A.D.3d 707, 875 N.Y.S.2d 911

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sealey. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 A.D.3d 578 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 2009·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 31, 2007 (People v Sealey, 42 AD3d 578 [2007]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 31, 2004.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the [708]*708effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Rivera, Skelos and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 31, 2007 (People v Sealey, 42 AD3d 578 [2007]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 31, 2004.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the [708]*708effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Rivera, Skelos and Balkin, JJ., concur.

People v. Sealey, 61 A.D.3d 707, 875 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

61 A.D.3d 707 (People v. Sealey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related