People v. Seabrook

151 A.D.2d 703, 543 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8207
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Seabrook. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 A.D.2d 583

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), rendered September 21, 1987, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[704]*704Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention that the sentence should be vacated because it was based upon improper considerations is without merit. Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Seabrook, 151 A.D.2d 703, 543 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

151 A.D.2d 703 (People v. Seabrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)