People v. Scott

2021 NY Slip Op 02660, 143 N.Y.S.3d 236, 193 A.D.3d 1362
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 30, 2021
Docket408 KA 17-01855
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02660 (People v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Scott, 2021 NY Slip Op 02660, 143 N.Y.S.3d 236, 193 A.D.3d 1362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Scott (2021 NY Slip Op 02660)
People v Scott
2021 NY Slip Op 02660
Decided on April 30, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 30, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

408 KA 17-01855

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

MICHAEL T. SCOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas E. Moran, J.), rendered December 5, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends and the People correctly concede that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because Supreme Court's oral colloquy and the written waiver of the right to appeal "mischaracterized [the waiver] as an 'absolute bar' to the taking of an appeal" (People v Dozier, 179 AD3d 1447, 1447 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 941 [2020], quoting People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]). We note that the better practice is for the court to use the Model Colloquy, which "neatly synthesizes . . . the governing principles" (People v Brooks, 187 AD3d 1587, 1588 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 1049 [2021] [internal quotation marks omitted]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: April 30, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Green v. Bolton
2020 NY Slip Op 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Brooks
2020 NY Slip Op 05387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 02660, 143 N.Y.S.3d 236, 193 A.D.3d 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-scott-nyappdiv-2021.