People v. Scott

18 A.D.3d 1071, 795 N.Y.S.2d 478, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5666
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 A.D.3d 465

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), [1072]*1072rendered March 17, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 4 to 8 years. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Scott, 18 A.D.3d 1071, 795 N.Y.S.2d 478, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

18 A.D.3d 1071 (People v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)