People v. Scott

283 A.D.2d 1012, 725 N.Y.S.2d 254
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 2001·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence (see, People v Martinez, 278 AD2d 818; see also, People v Coutts, 277 AD2d 1029; People v Michael S., 273 AD2d 804, 804-805). In any event, defendant “ ‘received the precise sentence for which he bargained’ ” (People v Martinez, supra, quoting People v Mayers, 74 NY2d 931, 932). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Scott, 283 A.D.2d 1012, 725 N.Y.S.2d 254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 1012 (People v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Scott
283 A.D.2d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)