People v. Scott

245 A.D.2d 1064, 666 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 A.D.2d 1047

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (two counts) (Penal Law § 165.45 [2]) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We further conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Finally, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Purple, Jr., J.—Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 4th Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Scott, 245 A.D.2d 1064, 666 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 1064 (People v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Satterfield
488 N.E.2d 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)