People v. Scott

193 A.D.2d 1145, 600 N.Y.S.2d 647
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not, on this application, met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature (see, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Jacobsen, 170 AD2d 1043). Furthermore, pursuant to section 701 of the County Law, we do not have the authority to appoint a special prosecutor. Present—Callahan, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed May 24, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Scott, 193 A.D.2d 1145, 600 N.Y.S.2d 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 1145 (People v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Scott
197 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)