People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Scott

88 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17290

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Scott, 88 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Gallucci, J.), rendered August 12, 1980, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By order of this court dated July 6, 1981, the case was remitted to the County Court to hear and report on the defendant’s motion to suppress certain statements allegedly made by him, and the appeal has been held in abeyance during the interim (People v Scott, 83 AD2d 567). The report of the County Court has been received. Judgment affirmed. After examining the testimony of the prosecution’s witnesses and that of the defendant, we agree with the County Court that the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s statements were voluntarily made after the requisite warnings had been administered to him. We have examined the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Gallucci, J.), rendered August 12, 1980, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By order of this court dated July 6, 1981, the case was remitted to the County Court to hear and report on the defendant’s motion to suppress certain statements allegedly made by him, and the appeal has been held in abeyance during the interim (People v Scott, 83 AD2d 567). The report of the County Court has been received. Judgment affirmed. After examining the testimony of the prosecution’s witnesses and that of the defendant, we agree with the County Court that the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s statements were voluntarily made after the requisite warnings had been administered to him. We have examined the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 939, 450 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-scott-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack