People v. Scott

California Court of Appeal

People v. Scott

84 Cal. App. 25

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 16, 1927

DocketCrim. No. 1465

StatusPublished

This text of 84 Cal. App. 25 (People v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Scott, 84 Cal. App. 25 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

The defendant was charged by an information filed on August 6, 1926, with the crime of robbery. The first trial of the case, resulting in a conviction, was commenced on the sixth day of October, 1926. On October 21st the court set aside the verdict of guilty and granted a new trial and reset the case for trial on the twenty-eighth day of October, and on that day continued the matter for trial until the eighth day of December, 1926, when the second trial was had. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and judgment was pronounced thereon, and defendant prosecutes this appeal from that judgment, urging only one point for its reversal, to wit: That defendant was not brought to trial within sixty days from the filing of the information.

The point here raised was directly passed upon by us in hádeos corpus proceedings involving this defendant [26]*26(In re Scott, 81 Cal. App. 577 [254 Pac. 596]). That opinion conclusively disposes of this appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

.Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

The defendant was charged by an information filed on August 6, 1926, with the crime of robbery. The first trial of the case, resulting in a conviction, was commenced on the sixth day of October, 1926. On October 21st the court set aside the verdict of guilty and granted a new trial and reset the case for trial on the twenty-eighth day of October, and on that day continued the matter for trial until the eighth day of December, 1926, when the second trial was had. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and judgment was pronounced thereon, and defendant prosecutes this appeal from that judgment, urging only one point for its reversal, to wit: That defendant was not brought to trial within sixty days from the filing of the information.

The point here raised was directly passed upon by us in hádeos corpus proceedings involving this defendant [26]*26(In re Scott, 81 Cal. App. 577 [254 Pac. 596]). That opinion conclusively disposes of this appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

.Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 Cal. App. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-scott-calctapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack