People v. Schweitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schweitzer

88 N.Y.S. 1112

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 1904·Published

Opinion

HATCH, J.

I vote for the affirmance of the judgments in the above cases solely upon the ground that the decision in People v. Boot-man (decided herewith) 88 N. Y. Supp. 887, is decisive of the questions presented, and there remains no room for further debate in this court.

PATTERSON, O’BRIEN, and LAUGHLIN, JJ., concur.

McLAUGHLIN, J.

For the reasons stated in my opinion in People v. Bootman (decided herewith) 88 N. Y. Supp. 887, I dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HATCH, J.

I vote for the affirmance of the judgments in the above cases solely upon the ground that the decision in People v. Boot-man (decided herewith) 88 N. Y. Supp. 887, is decisive of the questions presented, and there remains no room for further debate in this court.

PATTERSON, O’BRIEN, and LAUGHLIN, JJ., concur.

McLAUGHLIN, J.

For the reasons stated in my opinion in People v. Bootman (decided herewith) 88 N. Y. Supp. 887, I dissent.

People v. Schweitzer, 88 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

88 N.Y.S. 1112 (People v. Schweitzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related