People v. Schwartz
This text of 90 A.D.2d 800 (People v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Owens, J.), dated March 26, 1982, as granted the branch of defendant’s motion which sought to dismiss the second count of the indictment filed against her (charging her with attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree). Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, motion denied as to the second count of the indictment, and said count is reinstated. We find that the evidence submitted to the Grand Jury, “if accepted as true, would establish every element of [the] offense charged [in the second count] and the defendant’s commission thereof” (see CPL 70.10, subd 1; 210.20, subd 1, par [b]). The evidence was therefore sufficient to sustain the second count of the indictment (see People v Warner-Lambert Co., 51 NY2d 295, cert den 450 US 1031). Furthermore, the police conduct in this case did not “reveal a brazen and continuing pattern in disregard of fundamental rights” so as to violate defendant’s right to due process (see People v Isaacson, 44 NY2d 511, 523). The second count of the indictment was therefore improperly dismissed. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.2d 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1982.