People v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schwartz

63 A.D.2d 688, 404 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11587

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Schwartz. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 A.D.2d 967 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 8, 1978·Published

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 18, 1975, convicting her of various drug-related offenses, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentences. Judgment modified, as to the sentences, so as to provide that all terms of imprisonment imposed are to run concurrently. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentences imposed were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Upon the argument of this appeal, counsel for defendant conceded that his client has been imprisoned for approximately four years and has not been committed for mental incompetence. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 18, 1975, convicting her of various drug-related offenses, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentences. Judgment modified, as to the sentences, so as to provide that all terms of imprisonment imposed are to run concurrently. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentences imposed were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Upon the argument of this appeal, counsel for defendant conceded that his client has been imprisoned for approximately four years and has not been committed for mental incompetence. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

People v. Schwartz, 63 A.D.2d 688, 404 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

63 A.D.2d 688 (People v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.