People v. Schwartz
This text of 255 A.D. 970 (People v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment of conviction and dismiss the [971]*971indictment upon the ground that the guilt of the defendant Joseph Schwartz was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. There was insufficient proof (1) that appellant knew the property in question was stolen, and (2) that he, at any time, with felonious intent, had or received possession of the property allegedly stolen. (People v. Walker, 198 N. Y. 329.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 970, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1938.