People v. Schwartz

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Schwartz

192 N.E. 588, 265 N.Y. 310, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1036

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 26, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 192 N.E. 588 (People v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Schwartz, 192 N.E. 588, 265 N.Y. 310, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1036 (N.Y. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Pound, Ch. J.

A deputy sheriff is charged with parking a vehicle between seven a. m. and six p. m. in front of the court house in the city of Syracuse within the congested district for a longer period than forty-five minutes in violation of a traffic ordinance of the city. His defense is that he used the car on official business and that no other parking facilities were afforded for the vehicle. Unless some divinity doth hedge a deputy sheriff, this can be no defense. The county can provide parking space to keep the cars of the deputy sheriffs off the street. Until then deputy sheriffs are like common folks in this respect. Defendant was a civil deputy, not on police duty. No emergency excused him. He parked his car on the street for his personal convenience and was subject, like others, to the terms of the ordinance.

The judgment of the County Court should be reversed and that of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed.

Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pound, Ch. J.

A deputy sheriff is charged with parking a vehicle between seven a. m. and six p. m. in front of the court house in the city of Syracuse within the congested district for a longer period than forty-five minutes in violation of a traffic ordinance of the city. His defense is that he used the car on official business and that no other parking facilities were afforded for the vehicle. Unless some divinity doth hedge a deputy sheriff, this can be no defense. The county can provide parking space to keep the cars of the deputy sheriffs off the street. Until then deputy sheriffs are like common folks in this respect. Defendant was a civil deputy, not on police duty. No emergency excused him. He parked his car on the street for his personal convenience and was subject, like others, to the terms of the ordinance.

The judgment of the County Court should be reversed and that of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed.

Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.E. 588, 265 N.Y. 310, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schwartz-ny-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack