Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Schulz

People v. Schulz

59 N.E.2d 175, 293 N.Y. 805, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2232
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 1944·Published

Opinions

Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Court of Special Sessions affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.

RIPPEY and CONWAY, JJ., dissent upon the ground that there is no prohibition, in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, of the act charged against the defendant and that such prohibition may not be implied. (People v. Wallace Company, 282 N.Y. 417, 419;People v. Nelson, 153 N.Y. 90, 94; People v. Weinstock,193 N.Y. 481, 485.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Schulz, 59 N.E.2d 175, 293 N.Y. 805, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2232 (N.Y. 1944).

59 N.E.2d 175 (People v. Schulz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Weinstock
86 N.E. 547 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)
People v. . Nelson
46 N.E. 1040 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
People v. Wallace Company
26 N.E.2d 959 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)