Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Schulz

People v. Schulz

59 N.E.2d 175, 293 N.Y. 805, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2232
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 1944
StatusPublished

This text of 59 N.E.2d 175 (People v. Schulz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Schulz, 59 N.E.2d 175, 293 N.Y. 805, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2232 (N.Y. 1944).

Opinions

Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Court of Special Sessions affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.

RIPPEY and CONWAY, JJ., dissent upon the ground that there is no prohibition, in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, of the act charged against the defendant and that such prohibition may not be implied. (People v. Wallace Company, 282 N.Y. 417, 419;People v. Nelson, 153 N.Y. 90, 94; People v. Weinstock,193 N.Y. 481, 485.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. . Weinstock
86 N.E. 547 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)
People v. . Nelson
46 N.E. 1040 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
People v. Wallace Company
26 N.E.2d 959 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.E.2d 175, 293 N.Y. 805, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schulz-ny-1944.