People v. Schultz

40 A.D.2d 690, 336 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3793
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 690 (People v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Schultz, 40 A.D.2d 690, 336 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

In a eoram nobis proceeding to vacate a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered November 21, 1952, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 22, 1971, which denied the application without a hearing. Order affirmed, without prejudice to a subsequent application by defendant, if he be so advised, on proper papers. In our opinion, defendant’s conelusory allegations lack the requisite specificity and corroboration in the form of available affidavits and records to warrant the granting of a hearing (People v. Cornish, 21 A D 2d 280, 285). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Shippens
123 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.2d 690, 336 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schultz-nyappdiv-1972.