People v. Schroeder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schroeder

104 A.D.2d 1055, 481 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20500

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 A.D.2d 1055 (People v. Schroeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Schroeder, 104 A.D.2d 1055, 481 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered August 23, 1983, convicting him of criminal mischief in the third degree and resisting arrest, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

[1056]*1056Judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).

A review of the record reveals that the People proved defendant’s guilt of every element of criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law, § 145.05) beyond a reasonable doubt and that the proof adduced to meet the $250 figure set forth in section 145.05 of the Penal Law was sufficient. We also conclude that defendant received a fair trial and effective representation within the meaning of the Constitution (see People v Aiken, 45 NY2d 394, 399-400; People v Morris, 100 AD2d 630, 631; People v Abdullah, 100 AD2d 550, 551). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Bracken and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered August 23, 1983, convicting him of criminal mischief in the third degree and resisting arrest, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

[1056]*1056Judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).

A review of the record reveals that the People proved defendant’s guilt of every element of criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law, § 145.05) beyond a reasonable doubt and that the proof adduced to meet the $250 figure set forth in section 145.05 of the Penal Law was sufficient. We also conclude that defendant received a fair trial and effective representation within the meaning of the Constitution (see People v Aiken, 45 NY2d 394, 399-400; People v Morris, 100 AD2d 630, 631; People v Abdullah, 100 AD2d 550, 551). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Bracken and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 1055, 481 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schroeder-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack