People v. Schraenkler

221 A.D.2d 1003, 635 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13509
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 A.D.2d 1003 (People v. Schraenkler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Schraenkler, 221 A.D.2d 1003, 635 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The motion to suppress defendant’s statement to the police was properly denied. The record supports County Court’s determinations that defendant was not in custody prior to receiving Miranda warnings (see, People v Flecha, 195 AD2d 1052; People v Forbes, 182 AD2d 829, Iv denied 80 NY2d 895) and that the ruse employed by the police during the questioning of defendant did not render his statement involuntary (see, People v Robinson, 201 AD2d 931, Iv denied 83 NY2d 875). (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Parenti, J.—Kidnapping, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Manzi
292 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D.2d 1003, 635 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schraenkler-nyappdiv-1995.