People v. Schouenborg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schouenborg

188 A.D.2d 625, 592 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14467

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 A.D.2d 625 (People v. Schouenborg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Schouenborg, 188 A.D.2d 625, 592 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered November 9, 1989, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While the defendant purports to challenge for the first time on appeal both the knowing and voluntary nature of his plea as well as the legal sufficiency of his allocution of the facts of the crime, these issues have not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, we find that the defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary and that the allocution was [626]*626factually sufficient (see, People v Lopez, supra; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered November 9, 1989, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While the defendant purports to challenge for the first time on appeal both the knowing and voluntary nature of his plea as well as the legal sufficiency of his allocution of the facts of the crime, these issues have not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, we find that the defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary and that the allocution was [626]*626factually sufficient (see, People v Lopez, supra; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 625, 592 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schouenborg-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack