People v. Schoonover

22 A.D.2d 1007, 254 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2675

This text of 22 A.D.2d 1007 (People v. Schoonover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Schoonover, 22 A.D.2d 1007, 254 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed. Williams P. J., concurs in the following memorandum: There is nothing in the petition to show or indicate that at the time defendant was being questioned and up to the time he signed the so-called confession, he requested counsel. (Appeal from order of Chautauqua County Court, denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for grand larceny, first degree, rendered February 20, 1950.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Yecehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 A.D.2d 1007, 254 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schoonover-nyappdiv-1964.