People v. Schoharie Common Pleas
This text of 1 Wend. 315 (People v. Schoharie Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
The justice erred in receiving testimony as to the time to which the cause was adjourned. His docket, or the record kept by himself, of the proceedings, was the best and only proper evidence; that, however, is not the question this court is called upon to decide, which is, what is the remedy of a plaintiff where he is nonsuited in a justice’s court after issue joined % must he bring a certiorari, or may he appeal ? The common pleas quashed the appeal, it would seem, on the ground that the plaintiff’s remedy was by certiorari; in this they erred. It is only where there is no issue, that a certiorari will lie. (4 Cowen, 536. Ib. 501.) Every error that intervenes before the justice after issue joined, must be corrected by appeal, and not by certiorari. An alternative mandamus is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wend. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schoharie-common-pleas-nysupct-1828.