People v. Schneider

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Schneider

32 N.E.2d 833, 285 N.Y. 547, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1582

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Schneider. Read the opinion of the Court — 284 N.Y. 781 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 24, 1941·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned, it will be amended by adding after the words “ Judgment affirmed ” the following: “ this Court having overruled the contention of the appellant that his trial and conviction were in violation of the due process clause and the equal protection of the *548 law clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and having refused to pass upon the effect of any parts of the charge to which no exceptions were taken.” (See 284 N. Y. 781.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned, it will be amended by adding after the words “ Judgment affirmed ” the following: “ this Court having overruled the contention of the appellant that his trial and conviction were in violation of the due process clause and the equal protection of the *548 law clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and having refused to pass upon the effect of any parts of the charge to which no exceptions were taken.” (See 284 N. Y. 781.)

People v. Schneider, 32 N.E.2d 833, 285 N.Y. 547, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1582 (N.Y. 1941).

Pincite

32 N.E.2d 833 (People v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related