People v. Schmitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schmitt

271 A.D.2d 1021

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1021 (People v. Schmitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Schmitt, 271 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting him of [1022]*1022violating section 986 of the Penal Law (book-making). Judgment reversed on the law, the information dismissed, and the fine remitted. The evidence was not sufficient to warrant the finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Carpenito, 292 N. Y. 498; People v. Solomon, 268 App. Div. 878; People v. LuMen, 268 App. Div. 923.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting him of [1022]*1022violating section 986 of the Penal Law (book-making). Judgment reversed on the law, the information dismissed, and the fine remitted. The evidence was not sufficient to warrant the finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Carpenito, 292 N. Y. 498; People v. Solomon, 268 App. Div. 878; People v. LuMen, 268 App. Div. 923.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schmitt-nyappdiv-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack