People v. Schmidt

63 Misc. 2d 665, 313 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1535
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 16, 1970·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was improper for the People to call defendant as a witness against himself at the narcotic addiction hearing. The privilege against self incrimination can be claimed in any proceeding, whether criminal or civil, administrative or judicial, [666] investigatory or adjudicatory (Matter of Gault, 387 U. S. 1, 47-48; People v. Martin, N. Y. L. J., Feb. 19, 1970, p. 14, col. 4).

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously modified on the law by vacating sentence certifying defendant to the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission, and case remanded to the District Court of Nassau County for a new trial on the issue of whether defendant is a narcotic addict, and for such further proceedings as may be appropriate; as so modified, judgment of conviction affirmed.

Concur — Hogan, P. J., Glickman and Pittoni, JJ.

Judgment modified,, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Schmidt, 63 Misc. 2d 665, 313 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1535 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1970).

63 Misc. 2d 665 (People v. Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re GAULT
387 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1967)