People v. Schmidt

New York Supreme Court

People v. Schmidt

63 Misc. 2d 665, 313 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1535

DecidedJune 16, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 63 Misc. 2d 665 (People v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Schmidt, 63 Misc. 2d 665, 313 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1535 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was improper for the People to call defendant as a witness against himself at the narcotic addiction hearing. The privilege against self incrimination can be claimed in any proceeding, whether criminal or civil, administrative or judicial, [666]*666investigatory or adjudicatory (Matter of Gault, 387 U. S. 1, 47-48; People v. Martin, N. Y. L. J., Feb. 19, 1970, p. 14, col. 4).

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously modified on the law by vacating sentence certifying defendant to the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission, and case remanded to the District Court of Nassau County for a new trial on the issue of whether defendant is a narcotic addict, and for such further proceedings as may be appropriate; as so modified, judgment of conviction affirmed.

Concur — Hogan, P. J., Glickman and Pittoni, JJ.

Judgment modified,, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI